November 20, 2009By Lori Cunningham
The California Energy Commission (CEC) voted to restrict the sale of energy efficient TV's and enforce stricter standards on TV's sold in California. Is now the time to rush out and buy a TV before the ban is enacted in January 2011?

There are many inefficient TV's being sold that are increasing energy consumption, especially when you consider the proliferation of larger screen TV's in homes across America. Plasma TV's are heralded for their brightness and richness of colors, but some plasmas use up to three times more electricity than the older cathode-ray tubes.

Earlier this week, the California Energy Commission (CEC) voted unanimously to restrict the sale of energy wasting TV's, up to 58 inches in size and enforce stricter standards on TV's sold in California.

According to the California Energy Commissions website:

The restriction and stricter standards only apply to TVs sold in California after January 1, 2011. The first standard (Tier 1) would take effect January 1, 2011, and reduce energy consumption by average of 33 percent. The second measure (Tier 2) would take effect in 2013 (applies to TV's larger than 58") and, in conjunction with Tier 1, reduce energy consumption by an average of 49 percent.

What This Ban Means to You

O Increased costs for TV's. The CEC is imposing higher standards on TV manufacturers to reduce energy consumption. Standards include reduced luminance in brightness levels and an automatic standby mode that occurs after 15 minutes without a TV signal. Manufacturers will only need to implement these new standards for TV's sold in California.

O Annoying Standby Screen. The automatic standby mode will be cumbersome if watching a show and the standby screen comes on.

O California is the only state enforcing these standards. As new TV's are likely to be more costly, it is very possible that people will begin purchasing their TV's from the Internet or out of state. This will result in a loss of jobs in California and decreased sales tax income.

O On the positive side, the CEC believes Californians will save an average for $30/TV the first year, assuming you're using a highly efficient TV. So it is possible you'll save some money.

O Your current TV's are not effected by the ban, it only applies to TV's sold beginning January 1, 2011.

Should I Buy A TV Now Before the Ban Begins?

You're probably asking, "Should I run out and buy my TV's now before the ban begins?" According to several TV manufacturers, meeting the low wattage standards will not be difficult. Many manufacturers are selling more energy efficient TV's now. In fact, as of September, it's reported that more than 1,000 TV's already meet the 2011 standards.

The simple answer is, if you really need a TV, buy one now. But if you can, wait. Technology is rapidly advancing and by 2011, the new OLED TV's will be rolled out. OLED TV's are remarkably thin, have a more vibrant picture, and consume less energy than today's plasmas and LED screens. See http://www.oled-display.net/oled-television for more information on OLED TV's.

Lori is a Chino Hills resident who blogs about making technology simple for busy moms. For more news and reviews on technology, visit her blog at WellConnectedMom.com.

Comments

Governor Schwarzenegger is shooting himself in the foot!

This ban is wrong also in an overall energy savings perspective.

1.

Where there is a problem - deal with the problem!

Energy: there is no energy shortage

(given renewable/nuclear development possibilities, with set emission limits)

and consumers - not politicians - pay for energy and how they wish to use it.

Notice: If there was an energy shortage, its price rise would limit people using it anyway.

No need to legislate for it!

It might sound great to

"Let everyone save money by only allowing energy efficient products"

However:

Inefficient products that use more energy can have performance,

appearance and construction advantages

Examples (using cars, buildings, dishwashers, TV sets, light bulbs etc):

http://ceolas.net/#cc211x

For example, big plasma TV screens have image contrast and other

advantages along with their large image sizes.

Products using more energy usually cost less, or they'd be more energy

efficient already.

Depending on how much they are used, there might therefore not be any

running cost savings either.

Other factors contribute to a lack of savings:

If households use less energy,

then utility companies make less money,

and will just raise electricity prices to cover their costs.

So people don't save as much money as they thought.

Conversely,

energy efficiency in effect means cheaper energy,

so people just leave TV sets etc on more, knowing that energy bills are lower,

as also shown by Scottish and Cambridge research

http://ceolas.net/#cc214x

Either way, supposed energy - or money - savings aren't there.

2.

Taxation, while still wrong, is better than bans for all concerned.

This is not like a ban on dangerous lead paint!

It's simply a ban to reduce electricity consumption.

TV set taxation based on energy efficiency - unlike bans - gives

Governor Schwarzenegger's impoverished California Government income on

the reduced sales, while consumers keep choice.

This also applies generally,

to CARS, BUILDINGS, DISHWASHERS, LIGHT BULBS etc,

where politicians instead keep trying to define what people can or can't use.

Politicians can use the tax money raised to fund home insulation

schemes, renewable projects etc that lower energy use and emissions

more than remaining product use raises them.

Energy efficient products can have any sales taxes lowered, making

them cheaper than today.

People are not just hit by taxes, they don't have to buy the higher

taxed products - and at least they CAN still buy them.

----------------------

Why energy efficiency regulations are wrong,

whether you are for or against energy and emission conservation

http://ceolas.net/#cc2x

Summary

Politicians don't object to energy efficiency as it sounds too good to

be true. It is.

--The Consumer Side

Product Performance -- Construction and Appearance

Price Increase -- Lack of Actual Savings: Money, Energy or Emissions.

Choice and Quality affected

-- The Manufacturer Side

Meeting Consumer Demand -- Green Technology -- Green Marketing

--The Energy Side

Energy Supply -- Energy Security -- Cars and Oil Dependence

--The Emission Side

Buildings -- Industry -- Power Stations -- Light Bulbs and other

electrical products

Posted by lighthouse10 on 11/21/09, 02:17 PM

Submit New Comment


Please login to submit a comment.

Don't have an account? Click to register for free.





subscribe to our newsletter...

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Visit News Message Archives

Featured Past Articles

Dolcissimo, which means "the sweetest" in Italian, recently opened in The Shoppes at Chino >>
High school students who would like to gain some interesting experience are encouraged to apply to s >>
The West Valley area of San Bernardino continues to have one of the highest incidences of West Nile >>

Advertise on ChinoHills.com